Showing posts with label math programs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label math programs. Show all posts

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Fractions: Adding fractions using grids

Using Grids to add fractions

 
    
  Every year one of our greatest struggles is teaching the addition of fractions.  There are a variety of reasons for this.  Weak basic skills, following multiple steps and in general a bad attitude about all things dealing with fractions.  We believe that one of the biggest struggles for students is the inability to visualize how fractions interact with each other.
 
     The solution for us was to teach fractions using a grid system.  We originally started using this with our math intervention students (see http://thelandofmath.blogspot.com/2013/06/our-middle-school-math-intervention.html).  We later expanded its use in our regular classes with positive results.

     The benefits of the grid system:

  • Very inexpensive
    • Just paper, a couple of markers or highlighters, and some blocks or chips
  • It is hands on
  • It is visual
  • You can work individually, with partners or in small groups
  • Set up time is short and requires minimal effort
  • Easy to model on white board or smart board
  • This lesson compliments our lessons on subtracting fractions and equivalent fractions (see http://thelandofmath.blogspot.com/2013/10/teaching-equivalent-fractions-using.html).
     We usually focus on fractions with denominators ranging from two (2) to eight (8).  We use this range of numbers because of ease of use, but you can go as crazy as you want.
    

Step one

     Give the students an addition problem such as 1/4 + 1/3.  Have the students draw four (4) columns with one of the markers. and three rows with another color. The four columns and 3 rows are the two denominators we are using. We like to use different color markers to help students see the fourths and the thirds on the grid.


 


Step two


Tuesday, November 5, 2013

Creating a Successful Math Newsletter for your class

 

 
     One of the things we try to do each year is to create a math newsletter to share with parents, students and administration.  The main reason is to help develop better communication with parents.  The development of our newsletter is an ever evolving process, but we feel like we have hit on some key things that make our newsletter very effective.
 
     At the start of the year we focus on gathering the email addresses of different parents, students and any one else that might want the newsletter.  We have been able to get around 90% of our student's families to sign up.  When we send out the newsletter we just email a PDF to the different people on our email list.  We mail copies to families that did not sign up for email.  We also make extra copies and leave in the classroom for students that might not see the email version. In the past we sent out newsletters each month.  This year we are attempting to send out one a quarter.
 
     Below is a sample of a newsletter from last school year. The rest of this article will focus on the content, features and structure of the newsletter.

 
 
Page 1 of the math newsletter
 
 
#1 Headline: The first thing we do on our newsletter is state what it is and for what time period.  In this case we call the newsletter the "7th grade math newsletter" (yes we know, verrrrry creative).  If we had newsletters for each individual teacher we might have use something like Mr. Mitchell's Math Class (also very boring) or perhaps something slightly more interesting such as Math Mania.

#2 Contact Information: This part of our newsletter includes information such as Names, email address, school phone, planning period times, website, etc.

#3 Quote: We like to have a quote about dealing with one of two topics: 1) Importance of math and/or 2) Motivational.

#4 Greeting: We address this to the parents despite the fact that many of the readers of the newsletter are our students.

#5 Dates to Know: Just like it sounds. We focus on big events such as early releases, no school, end of grading period, parent - teacher conferences, etc.


    
#6 Classroom Activity:  In this section of the newsletter we highlight an activity that takes place in the classroom. For example, this newsletter mentions our "Fab 5" which is a basic skills review at the start of each class.  In this section we might mention a math program we are using, special projects, or discuss our invention program.

#7 Upcoming Topics:  In this section we list what we are currently working on in class and what parents can expect in the next few weeks.

#8 Math Careers: One of our goals is to let parents and students know about the many career options available in mathematics.  It seems obvious to us, but many students have no idea about the math needed in different careers.  A couple of weeks ago a student told me how he wanted to be an architect but was stunned to find out math was required math.

Monday, July 1, 2013

Math education and Loyola Marymount basketball - it's more than running the system


Success in Math and Basketball - It's about talent



In the early 1990’s I coached basketball at Lewis and Clark College in Portland, Oregon for the legendary Bob Gaillard.  Coach Gaillard was a former head coach at the University of San Francisco when they were a major power house.   He had numerous teams qualify for the NCAA tournament and in 1977 he was selected the National Coach of the Year (UPI).  Needless to say the man knew hoops.

During this time Loyola Marymount (Los Angeles) was the talk of the college basketball world.  They had a Run-and-Gun style that racked up huge point totals (122 points per game).  They were led by stars Hank Gathers and Bo Kimble.  The team had a simple motto: Run the System.

As a young coach I loved their system.  I watched games on television, attended a game at the University of Portland and went to  a coaching clinic with Paul Westhead, LMU’s head coach.

As a side note: I nearly ran over coach Westhead as he was jogging in the parking lot before the coach’s clinic.

One day I was professing my admiration for the Loyola Marymount System to coach Gaillard.  Coach was not impressed by the system, but he was instead impressed with the talented players and coaches.  He felt that with their talent, LMU would have been very successful regardless of the system.

Loyola would have had two players selected in the first round of the NBA draft, but sadly Hank Gathers died of a heart attack during the last regular season basketball game.

What does Loyal Marymount University basketball system have to do with math?  It’s all about the system.

It seems every year we are introduced to some new system/program.  There is always some award winning teacher that talks about how this is the greatest system since sliced bread.

 Sliced bread was invented in 1928 by Otto Frederick Rohwedder and first used by a baker in Chillicothe, Missouri.  It first hit the shelf July 7, 1928. Not sure of the greatest invention before July 6, 1928.

Why do we have so many new programs?  Because there are teachers, grade levels and/or schools that are struggling.  The problem must be a broken system.

Every time a new program is introduced the same thing occurs:
  • Teachers grumble about the new changes
  • Administration talks about how this is not some fad, but the way we are going to teach. 
This is one of my personal favorite lines (or some version of it).  This is usually given either as an opening manifesto or stated when the administration senses the teachers are disgruntled. I realize the principal has to say this, but it’s still amusing to watch it unfold. 
  • There is a series of professional development complete with power point presentations and nifty new binders.
  • Teachers then begin to implement the new system.

And then…

…it’s usually more to the same.  The good teachers, grade levels and schools continue to thrive while the struggling teachers, grade levels, and/or schools continue to struggle.

Why? It’s not about the system.  The key is the talent.  In the case of education it’s the teacher.  As a teacher I have seen a variety of math and/or teaching programs.  A few were absolute duds, a yet some of the teachers still thrived with these flawed programs.

The best teachers pick the best items from each system and blend it into their own personal system.  Some teachers that struggle often rely on the new system to be their sole guide.  The difference between the excellent teacher and the struggling teacher is often the comfort level in the topic being taught.  The top teachers are comfortable with their knowledge of math and the students they teach.  This comfort allows these teachers to adapt and not adopt when new systems are introduced.

It seems to me that schools would better serve the students by increasing the knowledge and comfort of the teachers.

Todd Hawk is a middle school math teacher and the co-founder of the Land of Math website (www.landofmath.com). You can reach him at landofmath2@gmail.com or follow him on twitter: @landofmath2.
 

Friday, June 14, 2013

Our Middle School Math Intervention Program



The DeMATHa Project: A Math Intervention Program

            This past school year we were assigned the task of developing an intervention math program for the seventh grade.  We dubbed this program the DeMATHa (Developmental Math Academy) Project.  None of the students in the DeMATHa Project had previously passed the Ohio Academic Assessment (OAA).

The creation of this project was not only successful academically, but it was a tremendous learning experience for us. Despite many obstacles, nearly 70% of all students in DeMATHa were able to successfully pass the seventh grade OAA. 

No classroom.  No materials. No students.

            That was our situation the first day of the 2011-2012 school year as we prepared to teach an intervention math class.  The previous spring our district spent a great deal of time, money and energy on a special reading intervention program. There were all day in-services, tons of available materials, and detailed lists of students and their reading levels.   All of the teachers in the middle school were involved …except for the math teachers.

The math department was just an afterthought. We were given the task of creating from nothing and teaching a developmental math class.  Initially we thought we were going to have two small classes of about six or seven students. It turned out there was no class roster, only one room available and no resources devoted to this program.

Initially there was discussion of the usual focus on the basics, which is nothing more than code for a lot of worksheets and repetition. As the school year approached, we began to question this approach.  Many of the students that would be in this class already had a strong dislike for math.  In addition, these students were going to be pulled out of classes they enjoyed (gym, art, computer, etc.) to take another math class.  The prospect of cramming more worksheets down their throats would not be appealing to us or them.

Finding ourselves with no students, no resources, no curriculum and limited space, we developed a math manifesto for the DeMATHa Project.  These core principals are the foundation of what we felt were needed to have success with these students.

The DeMATHa Project Core Beliefs

FUN & RELAXED

The most important objective of DeMATHa was to create a fun and relaxed environment. This is not to be confused with just goofing around.  We knew our only chance to help these students was to create a situation that was enjoyable.  Because we had total freedom, we were not limited by the constraints of a typical classroom and we were able to customize the class to best reach the students. 

Normally teachers are concerned about covering all the required material, but we had no required material.  When we covered a topic in class we took our time to insure that the students fully understood. Many times a one-week lesson would morph into a two week lesson.  Because of no time constraints, we could take as long as needed and present material in a variety of ways

We also included students’ input in the creation of the class.  During the first week we had the students peruse their math textbook and list topics in which they were interested. We then had the students vote on which topics to cover first.  In addition, we incorporated student interests into lessons.  For example, some students had an interest in hunting.  Throughout the year we found a variety of ways to incorporate hunting into some lessons such as a circle graph of favorite animals to hunt.

Another key to winning the students over was the use of humor.  There is a fine line between being entertaining and playing around.  We were able to enjoy humorous moments that naturally occur in class.  In addition, as teachers were able to play off of each other’s sense of humor.  We believe the students could sense that we were enjoying ourselves which resulted in a less threatening class.

Team teaching had an added benefit of allowing us to deal with issues as they occurred without slowing the momentum of the class.  Sometimes a student would be dealing with issues from home and these issues would spill out into the class.  With team teaching we were able to calmly take the student somewhere quiet and get to the core of the problem.  Many times the student just wanted to vent to someone.  Sometimes there were issues that we were able to directly address.  The bottom line is that we could keep the class calm and minimize conflict while at the same time building trust by showing the students that we were concerned with their welfare.

LIMIT WORKSHEETS

The second principal of DeMATHa was to try to avoid using worksheets and focus on hands on activities. The class would be made up of students with a strong dislike for worksheets.  As teachers we did not want to fall into the trap of over reliance on worksheets.  

We still used worksheets, but less than ten percent of what we would use in a normal class and with far fewer problems.  When we used a worksheet it was usually accompanied by manipulates such as algebra tiles.  Also, we did not assign homework which helped to reduce the amount of worksheets.

BIG CONCEPTS vs. BASIC FUNDAMENTALS

Third, we wanted to focus on bigger concepts.  We did not want to get bogged down on basic fundamentals.  Instead of spending a lot of time on topics like long division we wanted to focus on bigger topics like probability and understanding how to write equations.

The Ohio Academic Assessment for math does not test basic computation skills and allows the use of a calculator.  The OAA focuses on the student’s ability to use basic computation skills to solve more complex problems.  For example, instead of having the students multiply  the question might ask: “A cake is cut into three equal slices.  Tim eats ¼ of a slice.  What fraction of the cake did Tim eat?”  The student could use a variety of strategies to solve this problem such as multiplication, division or sketching out a visual model.

This is not to say we ignore student weaknesses in basic math skills.  We have a period each day called academic assist in which we tutor students on fundamental weaknesses.  We also use a basic skills review at the beginning of each class as a way to practice and chart progress of student’s basic skills.

VARIETY:  THE SPICE OF MATH

The fourth core belief of DeMATHa was variety.  We did not want to get in a rut doing the same thing each day.  Every day we tried to keep the student wondering what was next.  When we were working on ratios and similar objects we took the class on a “field trip” to the teacher’s workroom and used copiers to shrink and enlarge different items.  We tried a variety of art projects, played math games (our favorites: XP Math & Hooda Math) in computer lab, created Khan Academy accounts and tracked progress, let students use the Smart Board, used in class games/competitions, varied students ability to work individually, and allowed partners or group work in addition to many other items.

In addition, the topics also varied.  We made a concentrated effort not to cover topics currently or previously taught in the regular math class.  This created an atmosphere of discovery and not just reviewing material.

In sum, we always wanted the students to be curious about what was next.  If we ever felt things were getting stale, we immediately tried an activity that was 180 degrees from what we had been working on to keep their focus.

DeMATHa – A reflection

            In general we were very pleased with the progress of the DeMATHa students.  One of the best rewards came from watching the students in their regular math class.  Because these students had previously been introduced to the lessons, they had a swagger when these concepts were presented to the other students.  You could see the excitement in their eyes when they realized that they were ahead of other students in their math knowledge.  This newfound confidence in math resulted in greater participation in class and kept DeMATHa students focused.  In many cases the DeMATHa students would assist other students.  Also, the increase in confidence gave these students the fortitude to press on when they would encounter difficulties.

            The benefits of tandem teaching were something we had not expected. Our focus had always been divide and conquer.  It was just assumed that a small group with one teacher was the most effective way to operate. For us, combining these two small groups and working together was far more productive.

            Our core beliefs of a fun & relaxed environment, limited worksheets, focus on big concepts, and variety were reinforced with the DeMATHa Project.  The success of the project has led us to revamping how we structure our Academic Assist Period.  There are even certain elements, such as greater variety, that we can incorporate into our regular math class.  We are also exploring the development of a DeMATHa class for the gifted math students.

            The value of the DeMATHa project is supported by the numbers.  Prior to participation in the DeMATHa project, students had a 0% passage rate on previous math Ohio Academic Assessments.  After DeMATHa, nearly 70% of participants were proficient on the OAA.  To take students from zero to nearly 70 percent passage with a program that cost no money to our district and was created from scratch is a success, no matter how you add it.
 
This article was written by Todd Hawk and Chris Davis middle school math teachers and co founders of the Land of Math website (www.landofmath.com). You can follow Todd (@landofmath2), Chris (@landofmath1) or the website (@landofmath) on twitter.